🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and experience from the records is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.